Flixstock After
Flixstock Before

Problems With Traditional Photography

1

High Cost & Time Consuming

Outsourcing product photography to fashion hubs using traditional photography methods can increase the costs of logistics and increase production time. These all have a negative effect on online sales.
2

Lack Of Image Consistency

Large-scale image production involves the deployment of an army of photographers, stylists and models. With each new deployment the ability to maintain consistency is compromised
3

Irreversible Creative Decisions

Once shot, the model’s pose, accessories etc. are impossible to modify. Trying new, photographic options with fresh images of old products is practically out of the question

Problems With Traditional Photography

1

High Cost & Time Consuming

2

Lack Of Image Consistency

3

Irreversible Creative Decisions

Flixstock’s Value Proposition

Faster Time To Market

No need to wait for model photography to list your items online. Avoid unnecessary inventory costs and missed sales opportunities on the latest trends!

Models On Demand

No more struggle to find models near to a remote warehouse. Easily source the best talent from anywhere in the world wherever and whenever you need it

Significant Cost Savings

Model shots can be produced at a fraction of the traditional cost due to reduced labor, higher efficiency and process automation.

Quality & Consistency

A dedicated quality control executive is assigned to each account to ensure image quality and consistency on per with traditional model photography (or higher)

Higher Page Conversion

On-model shots increase e-commerce page conversion vs. flat or mannequin shots, leading to higher online revenue & sales.

Simple Image Capture

Apparel shots can be taken directly by the stylist without assistance from a photographer, technician, hair stylist, makeup artist,etc.